Brian Crow K3VR and Tom Whatley N1FM agitate and harass people, and when those people "threaten" them, they go crying to Law Enforcement, acting innocent.


Todd N9OGL in his “Why Does the FBI Have a LOW IQ???” on his Blog 18 Aug ‘09

Your metaphors are very clear Joe. Many of your threads have been locked because of your obsession with certain people on a certain frequency. You start a thread, relate to a certain frequency, wait for some else to make mention of a certain group, then sit back. The staff and management are very aware of this.


Tom N1FM/n1sob [Brian’s agent] trying for lock-down in “Can someone explain this to me?” on QRZ.com 18 Jul ‘09



I call major BS!!!!!

If that is what I'm doing, which I am not, why are you the person making the connection for me?

You're doing exactly what you don't want to have happen. [ß This, because Tom does not know how to spell “hypocrite”.]

That just doesn't make any sense whatsoever. [ß Did I ever tell you that Tom needs a major ‘central processor’ re-set?]

I do enjoy our conversations very much, but I'm too busy having fun with my friends on ham radio.

So I'll let you have the last word. It won't help your case, but I'll let you get in the last one.


ToeJoe N9PH to Tom ‘Hypocrite’ N1FM/n1sob in “Can someone explain this to me?” on QRZ.com 18 Jul ‘09



This letter was posted on www.suckK3VRoff.com which is owned by Brian Crow K3VR and Thomas Whatley Jr N1FM....and the FBI WONDERS WHY I FUCKING THREATEN PEOPLE...


Todd N9OGL proving that Psycho Brian is still a FRAUDulent serial snitch, on his Blog 24 Jul ‘09



The QUESTION that needs to be raised...what LAWS did YOU violate? You see, it's one thing to complain...but when you do it continuously...you’re not only harassing someone, you’re violating these individuals’ rights.… Oh wait, you don’t give a shit about that, do you?? Question is, how many innocent people did TOM WHATLEY N1FM put in prison using these same tactics when he was a cop??


Todd N9OGL posing a VERY good question, in “More from that STUPID Website…” on his Blog 13 Aug ‘09

I was listening on 20 last night and I heard 3 amateurs talking about how many official letters they had received from FCC enforcement. Two of the amateurs were quite proud that they had never received any letters in many, many years of operation. The third amateur was quite proud of the fact that he had received 10 letters. As a matter of fact, a slight argument occurred when one of the other amateurs said that he was certain it was only 9, instead of the 10.

Now I do understand how people can be proud of the fact that they have a $9,000 Rolex, or a $12,000 Icom, or an $83,000 Mercedes Benz, but I don't quite understand how one can be proud of getting 10 official letters from FCC enforcement.

Any amateur psychologists (or one that plays one on ham radio) [ß Psycho Brian.] care to explain.


ToeJoe N9PH in “Can someone explain this to me?” on QRZ.com 18 Jul ‘09



Well Joe I have the MP3 which is tagged. And it was Brian and I. And I do have the expensive Icom. And Brian is the psychologists' [ß sic] in the conversation that you are referring to.


Tom ‘Mother-Fucker’ WHATLEY N1FM/n1sob in “Can someone explain this to me?” on QRZ.com 18 Jul ‘09



Tom,

I didn't say one of the three in the conversation was a psychologist. Read it again, this time very slowly.

I didn't say one of the three in the conversation owned an expensive Icom. Read it again, this time very slowly.

And for the last time, the conversation I heard was not on that frequency.

Maybe you need a firmware update. [ß TJ, Tom needs a major ‘central processor’ re-set!]

HEHE...sorry, I couldn't resist.


ToeJoe N9PH to Tom WHATLEY, the ex-doughnut-eater, in “Can someone explain this to me?” on QRZ.com 18 Jul ‘09

This thread… was about a US amateur dropping the f-bomb and the FCC's response under Ms. Smith.

You're the perfect person to post to this thread in that you can contrast your experience with dropping the f-bomb under Riley and this incident with Ms. Smith in charge of enforcement. As I remember, in your 18 minute tirade last year, you hurled the f-bomb once, the MF bomb 7 times, and the anal orifice bomb 11 times.

You've said that you had to work it out with Riley [ß in the Gettysburg Bath-House] but I wonder if you can provide the details. Did Riley have a problem with your profanity? If so, did he cite what paragraph of Part 97 you were in violation of?

It seems to me that under Ms. Smith's interpretation of the rules, you might not have had any problem with the FCC at all.

Please elaborate....this is great stuff for all amateurs to know and fully understand.


ToeJoe N9PH to Tom MF’er N1FM/n1sob in “F-BOMBS AWAY….the FCC says it’s OK” on QRZ.com 25 Jun ‘09



Tom...

Has it been 3 years already? Wow! It seems like yesterday.

Let me correct you on an important point as you may not have had time to read my earlier posts. I don't care one way or the other about the language used on amateur radio. Actually, if I had any say in it, and I clearly don't, I'd prefer no enforcement over either bad or inconsistent enforcement. Hence the subject of this thread. We're merely trying to figure out what the rules of the game are.

I'm sure that after we figure out what is going on in US Amateur radio enforcement, we can expand the discussion to other countries. However, at this point, we are having enough trouble figuring out US enforcement. Sometimes you have to bound the problem before you can solve it.

That's why your MF-bombing case is so important. Were you contacted by Riley concerning the incident? What paragraphs in Part 97 did Riley say you violated? And what was the punishment for each infraction?

In addition, you might help me out with this question. If you were allowed to hurl the MF-bomb multiple times without any punishment, which your post seems to imply, why on earth do you believe that another amateur [ß In another country at that!] should be punished for the same behavior? To me, that seems to violate the most basic rules of fairness.

Thanks again for your comments. This is great stuff.


ToeJoe N9PH to Tom MF’er N1FM/n1sob in “F-BOMBS AWAY….the FCC says it’s OK” on QRZ.com 26 Jun ‘09

Riley was and always will be nothing more than an arrogant bully that threw his weight around on innocent hams. Good riddance to him.


Susan KB2SFH ARRL Life Member speaking from experience, in Tom’s “MISS RILEY” on QRZ.com 28 Mar ‘09



RH is gone and will stay gone. He's not coming back. Time to leave go. And from reading the Laura Smith threads following her appointment, it’s just not those "associated" with a certain frequency that are happy he is [gone], [it] is a rather significant subset of the ham community.


Ed W3DUB in Tom WHATLEY N1FM/n1sob’s silly “MISS RILEY” on QRZ.com 28 Mar ‘09



Laura Smith is doing a great job

I think that Laura Smith is doing a great job so far, judging by who her detractors are. [ß K3VR, N1FM/n1sob, KZ8O, etc.] She seems to have struck the fear of God into some of the hams that have been creating problems on the bands... [ß K3VR, N1FM/n1sob, KZ8O, W7CPA, KI4LUB, N1GJT, KE9RY, AC5IU, etc.] I was tuning around on 20 meters this morning, and the problem frequencies were quiet -- nobody was trying to chase contesters off of their frequencies. [ß KZ8O’s sub-specialty.]


Bill K3TP cogently observant, as usual, in Tom’s quickly mis-firing “MISS RILEY” on QRZ.com 28 Mar ‘09



I did speak to him on the phone regarding an accusation against me that was bogus. He was unwilling to hear my side of the situation at hand. Totally amazing how he sided with the other parties and didn't have all the facts. I feel because of his unwillingness to hear my side that he was personal friends with the other party. But I also didn't like his practice of publishing other accused parties’ personal addresses and the accusations against them. Too bad they all didn't band together for a class action lawsuit on him. He needed to be knocked down to his real size.


Susan KB2SFH recounting her experience with Riley to Tom in his “MISS RILEY” on QRZ.com 29 Mar ‘09

I certainly hope that she doesn't continue Riley's practice of issuing official notices to hams based on Internet chatter, blog entries or slanderous accusations made by participants in a grudge fight. [ß I believe that Fred means the likes of K3VR, N1FM/n1sob, W7CPA & Co. certainly on 14.275 MHz.]

If Ms. Smith issues a formal (and published) notice to someone accusing him/her of wrongdoing, the very least we should expect is that she has solid, verifiable evidence for same - not the nebulous "information before the Commission" that Rileygrams always referenced but never elaborated upon.

If said "information" is unverified, a request to the accused party to provide more information is in order but it should be kept confidential until the accused party issues a formal reply to the request and the credibility of the evidence behind the complaint is established. "No credible evidence, no formal publication" should be the rule.

"Lauragrams" (if that is the proper term) should not be made public unless and until the evidence for same is deemed credible. I use the term "credible" in the strict legal sense, not in the Riley sense of "I'm sure it's credible because I know the guy who complained and, besides, I don't like the guy he's complaining about." [ß Touché!]

A number of people who had Rileygrams published in the enforcement actions section of the Commission's website (and in QST) eventually got one-liners from Riley saying, in effect, "We accept your reply and we're dropping the issue." In other words, "The complaint was bogus in the first place (and we knew/should have known this), so to save face we're letting you off the hook and we're not going to do anything to the idiot who filed the false complaint against you."

Or, distilling the foregoing down to street vernacular, "[FUCK] you if you can't take a joke."


Fred K5FH cogent in Tom’s “I SURE MISS [Sucking Off] RILEY” on QRZ.com 27 Mar ‘09



Time WILL tell, and the Lady deserves a chance to prove her ability to perform in the job at hand. She has a right to develop her own style, and it's not really fair to demand she be a Riley clone.


Larry WA9SVD principled in Tom’s “MISS RILEY” on QRZ.com 28 Mar ‘09



I agree it is unfair to expect her to be like Riley.


John KA4DPO [no friend of mine] in Tom’s “MISS RILEY” on QRZ.com 28 Mar ‘09